Tuesday, October 18, 2011

Daniel Kahneman - The Marvels and the Flaws of Intuitive Thinking; Edge Master Class 2011

The Edge Master Class for September 2011 featured Nobel Laureate and Princeton professor of psychology Daniel Kahneman, author of the new book, Thinking, Fast and Slow (due out the end of this month).

You can read Jonah Lehrer's recent review of Kahneman's work at the Wall Street Journal.

Audio
Daniel Kahneman [9.12.11]

The Marvels and the Flaws of Intuitive ThinkingEdge Master Class 2011

Daniel Kahneman [9.12.11]


DANIEL KAHNEMAN is the Eugene Higgins Professor of Psychology Emeritus, Princeton University; Recipient, the 2002 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences; Author, Thinking Fast and Slow (forthcoming, October 25, 2011).


Daniel Kahneman's Edge Bio Page





The Marvels and the Flaws of Intuitive Thinking


The marvels and the flaws that I'll be talking about are the marvels and the flaws of intuitive thinking. It's a topic I've been thinking about for a long time, a little over 40 years. I wanted to show you a picture of my collaborator in this early work. What I'll be trying to do today is to sort of bring this up-to-date. I'll tell you a bit about the beginnings, and I'll tell you a bit about how I think about it today.




This is Amos Tversky, with whom I did the early work on judgment and decision-making. I show this picture in part because I like it, in part because I like very much the next one. That's what Amos Tversky looked like when the work was being done. I have always thought that this pairing of the very distinguished person, and the person who is doing the work tells you something about when good science is being done, and about who is doing good science. It's people like that who are having a lot of fun, who are doing good science.


We focused on flaws of intuition and of intuitive thinking, and I can tell you how it began. It began with a conversation about whether people are good intuitive statisticians or not. There was a claim at the University of Michigan by some people with whom Amos had studied, that people are good intuitive statisticians. I was teaching statistics at the time, and I was convinced that this was completely false. Not only because my students were not good intuitive statisticians, but because I knew I wasn't. My intuitions about things were quite poor, in fact, and this has remained one of the mysteries, and it's one of the things that I'd like to talk about today — what are the difficulties of statistical thinking, and why is it so difficult.

Read the whole article.

No comments: